Technoprogressivism
technoprogressivism, technoprogressivism, tech-progressivism or techprogressivism
is a stance of active support for both technological and democratic
social progress. Technoprogressives argue that technological developments can be profoundly empowering and emancipatory
when they are regulated by democratic and accountable authorities to ensure that their costs, risks and benefits are
fairly shared.
Technoprogressivism
Technoprogressives are heirs of the Enlightenment project of promoting human
freedom and happiness though both scientific and technological progress, and
democratic and liberal social change. For most technoprogressives science and
technology do not achieve ideal progress unless accompanied by a just distribution of the costs, risks, and benefits of these new knowledges and capacities. At the same time, for most
technoprogressive critics and advocates, the achievement of better democracy, greater fairness, less violence, and a wider rights culture are all desirable, but inadequate in themselves to confront the quandaries of contemporary technological societies unless and until they are accompanied by progress in science and technology to support and implement these values.
Technoprogressives support the civil rights of persons (human or non-human) to either maintain
or modify his or her own mind and body, on his or her own terms, through informed, consensual recourse to, or refusal of, available therapeutic or enabling biomedical technology.
Bioconservatism
Bioconservatives believe that emerging technologies, such as genetic
engineering and nanotechnology, should be restricted because of the threats they
pose to "human dignity" or social equality. Bioconservative positions include opposition to genetic modification
or cloning of food crops, farm and companion animals, and rejection of the genetic, prosthetic, and cognitive modification of human beings to overcome what are broadly perceived as current human biological and cultural limitations.
Bioconservatives range in political perspective from right-leaning religious and cultural conservatives to left-leaning environmentalists and technology critics. What unifies bioconservatives is skepticism about medical and other biotechnological transformations of the living world. Typically less sweeping as a critique of technological society than bioluddism, the bioconservative perspective is characterized by its defense of the natural, deployed as a moral category.
Although technoprogressivism is the stance which contrasts with bioconservatism in the biopolitical spectrum, both
technoprogressivisms and bioconservatisms, in their more moderate expressions, share an opposition to unsafe, unfair, undemocratic forms of technological development, and both recognize that such developmental modes can facilitate unacceptable recklessness and exploitation, exacerbate injustice and incubate dangerous social discontent.
Technoprogressive Issues on Wikipedia
Defining Technoprogressive Essays
James Hughes Hughes, James (2004). Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-4198-1.
Dale Carrico
Carrico, Dale (2004). "The Trouble with "Transhumanism": Part Two".
Retrieved on
2007-01-28.
Carrico, Dale (2005). "Technoprogressivism Beyond Technophilia and Technophobia".
Retrieved on
2007-01-28.
Carrico, Dale (2006). "The Politics of Morphological Freedom".
Retrieved on
2007-01-28.
Donna Haraway
Haraway, Donna (1991). "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century".
Retrieved on
2007-01-28.
Chris Mooney
Mooney, Chris (2005).
The Republican War on Science. Basic Books.
ISBN 0465046762.
Bruce Sterling
Sterling, Bruce (2001). "Viridian: The Manifesto of January 3, 2000".
Retrieved on
2007-01-28.
Technoprogressive Links
|